And that hex field could also feature a dropdown with colors from the theme palette. Or, if it can't be included there then it appears to the right of the color dot. Clicking the color icon opens the color palette but the hex color field is included there somewhere. Clicking smiley opens the above described display. To right there are two buttons, one is a symbolic icon like a smiley, the other an equally sized symbolic color dot (with, e.g thirds in red/yellow/blue). But if icons became more popular (I think the UI currently prevents this, just like tag colors) if they become more popular then we might see a plethora of icons such as emojis etc in which case such a temp-select might be appropriate. There is also an unnecessary line at top of the icon dropdown.Ĭonsidering that there is actually aconsiderable amount of icons, maybe (maybe!) one could temp-select multiple icons and see them above that (then necessary) line, and then make the final decision from one of those. And hovering over an icon could perhap show the name, if necessary. It woudl be cooler with just rows showing the icons. I'm not really interested in it's real path name. Perhaps better with a separate default icon next to the tab from wich th selector drops down?īut also, in selecting the icon. I'll return to your detailed previou answer but not tonoght. If the colored color field is omitted and perhaps the Count, it would only be a few "menu items" and it would be identical for each tag.īTW, what does "checkbox Default Tagger/Fields" do? Currently, clicking the tag deletes it, so this could instead be e.g the first option in a small/slim dropdown menu. you decide -)Īctually -but this is probably trickier to implement - I think the cleanest UI woudl be to have the tag settings display as a dropdown menu from clicking the tag. Does this have to do with Simple tagger. 3 other tiddlers use tag image but 33 use tag Image". x2 for plural, etc, I think it'll be valuable to have very transparent tagging so natural "categories" will emerge. Particularly when we TWederate, instead of seeing all of: Image, image, Img, img, Picture, picture, Pic. A Count number would bring more value if it is exposed during the tag selection, i.e when creating new tags: IMO a value in Count is (or would be) so that similar or redundant tags can be exposed and eliminated. At this displayed spot it is a "post-fact" - it doesn't really affect much ("ok, 3 other tiddlers using this tag.so?"). Or perhaps one could merge the colored color picker with the hex color display, so that clicking on the hex it also opens the color picker. In my mockup I made a mistake and I think it is reapeated here it is overkill to have the tagpill in the selected color and still show the selected color as a color. is there a reason to ever not have it display at max width? Perhaps instead options "Above" OR "As Tab" ?Ĭheckbox to select color for Simple tagger. If simple tagger is stays in Info, I agree it is desirable to be able to remove it from Above, but it still appears a bit odd with the repeated display under the tab also. Here are some ideas įirst, and very connected to the "Info button vs separate button" there is the checkbox Uninstall Above. Overall I think the interface might need some simplification. Regarding the introduced tag managing features - superb with immediate access just when you need it. My main thought Doesn't tagger (be it simple or not) deserve to be a tool button on it's own? I'm not repeating my preiouvs point about where to display it, I'm saying why should it be hidden in the Info button? It is "clearly" a set of features in itself and the practical use of it overshadows the rest of the stuff under Info. Ha! I drop an off-the-cuff reference to something and next time I look you've built something! Fantastic :-)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |